About Me

Name: J Vidrine
Email: jeff2037@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Devil Is In The Details

Ever listen to Pres Obama? His speech is very “calibrated”, e.g.. his wording on saying that the Cambridge, MA police acted stupidly and later saying that he should have “calibrated his words differently.”

His speeches and townhalls are long on generalities but miniscule on specifics.  There are examples concerning taxes, Gitmo, unemployment, jobs, and more. But I digress. The area in which he is most ambiguous is health care. His calibrated words tell us of the “crisis”, of the need for urgent, immediate action, and therefore the push to pass H.R. 3200 stat.  Over 1000 pages of governmental mumbo-jumbo, unintelligible to even Congress as Rep Dingel (D,MI) explained.  Most Americans (and Congress members) don't realize some of the groundwork for Obamacare was tucked into the emergency stimulus bill.

The government co-opted media is reporting disinformation and some outlets are not correcting it when they are caught. Lifenews.com reports, “Associated Press Reverses Itself, Admits Health Care Bills Include Abortion Funding .”  (i.e., your tax dollars paying for ending the lives of the most vulnerable in society.)

H.R. 3200 also includes mandated end of life consultations for those over a certain age. Like the state of Oregon, payments for physician-assisted suicide but not for expensive cancer drugs for those with a shorter life expectancy.  Bureaucrats making your decisions for you. This is not liberty. It is not ethical or moral.

The real hidden secret: federal government control of 1/6 of America's economy. This “centralizing” of power is the real agenda.  That is why all life. womb to tomb, must be defended from the central planners of this administration.  Martin Niemöller, German Protestant minister and social activist, wrote this poem:

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.  (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Niemoller)

I would like to take poetic license to paraphrase Rev. Niemoller:
First they came for the unborn,
I remained silent.
I was already born.

Then they came for the mentally ill.
I did not speak out,
I was sane.

When they came for those not able to contribute to society,
I remained silent,
I was a contributing member.

When I became old, infirmed, mentally ill, physically disabled, they came for me.
No one spoke out because those who would were gone,
Those who could are now powerless.

“ The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'”, quipped Ronald Reagan.  Government programs, especially those that should belong to the private sector, are black holes of inefficiency, waste, and inhumanity. They don't create wealth, merely transfer it from producers to non-producers.

So when it comes to protecting life, speak out. The elitist “do-gooders” sure do. From an interview in the July 12, 2009, New York Times Magazine, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg commenting on the Supreme Court's 1980 decision in Harris v. McRae, ruling that the Hyde Amendment's exclusion of funding nontherapeutic abortions from Medicaid was constitutional:
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”

Ginsburg has finally said aloud what the elites and eggheads have known all along.  Weeding out undesirable populations will be a consequence of this health care reform bill. Unintended or intentional? The reader must decide. But as Pres. Obama has demonstrated in bailouts, takeovers,   stimulus bills and now health care, the devil is in the details.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Can Tell A Lot About A President By The Czars He Keeps

Obama Science Advisor John Holdren Also Said Newborn Baby Net Fully Human
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) --
John Holdren, the Science Czar chosen by pro-abortion President Barack Obama, has already come under criticism for backing population control and forced abortions. Now, new information is appearing showing Holdren didn't believe that newborn infants are fully human. Holdren co-wrote a 1973 book ,“Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions," with infamous population control advocate Paul Ehrlich in which his view supporting forced abortion

 
appears. Holdren's office later denied
 
he held those views. In another manuscript, Holdren also says a newborn child “will ultimately develop into a human being” if properly fed and socialized. “The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,” Holdren wrote. Obama chose Holdren to become the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Full story at LifeNews.com
 

Czars are the apparent arbiters of Obama policy, unconfirmed by the Senate, with apparent power over broad areas of the administration. John Holdren has written scientifically absurd statements which seem to be lifted from the eugenics playbook of Nazi Germany. To distinguish between a newborn baby and a human being would in any place or time in the world be the irrational thoughts of a psychopath. But not in the ivory towers of academia in the United States. The idea that a newborn is not a human being until growing into a functioning adult devolves into the arguement that a human being is only human when that person is physically able to care for himself and contribute to society. Therefore, by this line of reasoning, one would lose the status of human being if by disease or accident  one was returned to a newborn-like state. The slope begins to become even more slippery as "logically" a person in this state, not contributing nor able to care for oneself, is now seen as a drain on society's resources. This person would not fit the definition of a human being, according to John Holdren.  Unwanted and undesirable, this "non-human" can justifiably be eliminated, much as one terminates an unwanted pregnancy.

My question to John Holdren and to you is, if this arguement is true, do you realize the greatest mind in cosmology would have been euthanised? Stephen Hawking, suffering from ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease), can't walk, talk, or feed himself. He is as helpless as a newborn. And we would be lessened, absent his brilliant insights into black holes and the origins of the universe.

All human life is precious. Can anyone say what makes one human or at what stage one becomes or stops being human? In my last post I quoted a Japanese proverb about knowing a man by his friends.  In this case one can tell much about a president by the czars he chooses.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abortionist-In-Chief and the Medal of Tyranny

President Barack Obama Awards Abortion Advocates With Medal of Freedom
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) --
President Barack Obama today named 16 recipients of the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom, which is the highest civilian honor that can be bestowed on its citizens. Obama's group of recipients includes abortion advocates who have repeatedly earned condemnation from the pro-life movement. In a statement LifeNews.com received, the White House said the medals were awarded to recipients who "make an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States."
The recipients were said to have promoted "world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors" and "were chosen for their work as agents of change" and because they "have changed the world for the better." Sen. Ted Kennedy

 
has earned pro-abortion records for decades for repeatedly voting to promote abortion, including his opposition to a ban on partial-birth abortions. yet he received a Presidential Medal of Freedom from Obama. Obama also awarded a medal to pro-abortion former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
 
.
Full story at LifeNews.com
 

The Medal of Freedom given to so many who are responsible for the deaths of countless millions through abortion throughout the world. As Ronald Reagan said, " Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born."   It is painfully obvious that Pres. Obama's campaign of hope and change should have had a subtitle, the Japanese proverb, " When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The War for Life

Remember the hit song War? I mean the original Motown release in 1970.

War, huh yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing.
War huh yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing.
Say it again y'all
War, huh good god
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. Listen to me

War-I despise
'Cause it means destruction
Of innocent lives
War means tears to thousands of mothers' eyes
When their sons go off to fight
And lose their lives

War, huh good god y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. say it again
War whoa lord
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. listen to me
It ain't nothin but a heartbreaker
Friend only to the undertaker

Oh war, is an enemy to all mankind
The thought of war blows my mind
War has caused unrest in the younger generation
Induction, then destruction who wants to die

War, good god y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. say it say it say it
War uh huh yeah huh
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. listen to me
It ain't nothin but a heartbreaker
Got one friend that's the undertaker

Oh war has shattered many young man's dreams
Made him disabled bitter and mean
Life is much to short and precious to spend fighting wars these days
War can't give life it can only take it away oooooh

War, huh good god y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing. say it say again

(Lyrics from http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1029)


Motown hitmakers Norman Whitfield and Barrett Strong wrote this song in1969. Recorded first by the Temptations, Motown head Berry Gordy didn't want them releasing such a controversial song, so Edwin Starr was selected. Starr didn't have as big a fan base to offend. It won a Grammy for Best R&B Male Vocal in 1971 after reaching #1 on Billboard's Hot 100 in 1970.  You may hear it here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8C4AIFgUg


Having grown up in this turbulent period in the Deep South, the song encapsulated the longing of many for peace and a respect for life.

“War-I despise
'Cause it means destruction
Of innocent lives
War means tears to thousands of mothers' eyes
When their sons go off to fight
And lose their lives”

Our generation has seen more than its share of destruction of innocent lives.  It is the legacy of our founding fathers that makes Americans value human life. Our country was founded on the principle of the individual and the right to life. To me that means all individuals.  Eugenicists, physician-assisted suicide, abortion, rationing healthcare to those “deserving”, and more are all threats to our founding principle. That is why I have started this blog.

Edwin Starr's song is a protest of the destruction of innocent lives, using the soul shout device employed by R&B great James Brown.

“War, huh good god y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing.”

There is a war ongoing. I don't refer to Iraq or Afghanistan here. The war is between the culture of life and the culture of death. One holds that all human life has value.  One does not.  It finds many forms and shapes that will be the topics of this blog.  If one agrees with Starr's lyrics, then the extrapolation would be:

Life, huh
What is it good for?
Absolutely everything!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »